A signal that disagrees
Three signals are smooth and one jumps wildly. What is supported before you name a failed part?
Read the simulated evidence and choose the conclusion it supports. These exercises teach reasoning; they are not a diagnosis of a real vehicle.
Compare a signal with related measurements and the simulated motion. A plausibility problem identifies a signal path, not automatically one failed sensor.
Three wheel-speed traces rise smoothly together.
One trace jumps instantly between zero and a very high value.
The simulated vehicle continues moving smoothly.
Think it throughOne wheel-speed trace instantly jumps from zero to a very high value while the simulated car moves smoothly. Must the other three traces be exactly equal to make the comparison useful?
Show the reasoning
No. Wheel speeds can differ in a corner; the useful clue is the isolated implausible jump against the motion context. Sensor, connection, supply and processing still need to be distinguished.
- Compare plausibility in context, not exact equality.
- Name only the conclusion the clues establish.